France's Parliamentary Ongoing Crisis: The Beginning of a Fresh Governmental Era
Back in October 2022, as Rishi Sunak took over as the UK's leader, he became the fifth British prime minister to occupy the position over a six-year span.
Triggered in the UK by Britain's EU exit, this signified unprecedented political turmoil. So what term captures what is unfolding in the French Republic, now on its fifth premier in two years â with three in the past 10 months?
The current premier, the newly reinstated SĂ©bastien Lecornu, may have gained a brief respite on that day, sacrificing Emmanuel Macronâs key pension reform in return for support from Socialist lawmakers as the cost of his administration's continuation.
But it is, in the best case, a short-term solution. The EUâs number two economic power is trapped in a political permacrisis, the likes of which it has not witnessed for many years â perhaps not since the establishment of its Fifth French Republic in 1958 â and from which there seems no simple way out.
Governing Without a Majority
Essential context: ever since Macron called an ill-advised snap general election in 2024, France has had a hung parliament split into three opposing factions â the left, far right and his own centre-right alliance â without any group holding a clear majority.
At the same time, the country faces twin financial emergencies: its debt-to-GDP ratio and deficit are now nearly double the EU threshold, and hard constitutional deadlines to pass a 2026 budget that starts controlling expenditures are nigh.
Against that unforgiving backdrop, both the prime ministers before Lecornu â Michel Barnier, who lasted from September to December 2024, and François Bayrou, who took office from December 2024 to September 2025 â were removed by parliament.
In mid-September, the leader named his close ally Lecornu as his latest PM. But when, just over a fortnight later, Lecornu presented his government team â which turned out to be largely unchanged from before â he faced fury from both supporters and rivals.
So much so that the next day, he resigned. After just 27 days in office, Lecornu became the briefest-serving prime minister in recent French history. In a respectful address, he blamed political intransigence, saying âpartisan attitudesâ and âpersonal ambitionsâ would make his job virtually unworkable.
A further unexpected development: shortly after Lecornuâs resignation, Macron asked him to stay on for two more days in a last-ditch effort to secure multi-party support â a mission, to put it mildly, not without complications.
Next, two of Macronâs former PMs openly criticized the struggling leader. Meanwhile, the far-right National Rally (RN) and radical left France Unbowed (LFI) refused to meet Lecornu, vowing to reject any and every new government unless there were early elections.
Lecornu persisted in his duties, engaging with all willing listeners. At the conclusion of his extension, he went on TV to say he thought âa solution remained possibleâ to avoid elections. The leader's team announced the president would appoint a new prime minister 48 hours later.
Macron honored his word â and on Friday appointed ⊠SĂ©bastien Lecornu, again. So recently â with Macron commenting from the wings that the nation's opposing groups were âfuelling divisionâ and âsolely responsible for this chaosâ â was Lecornuâs critical test. Could he survive â and can he pass that vital budget?
In a high-stakes speech, the 39-year-old PM outlined his financial plans, giving the centre-left Socialist party (PS), who detest Macronâs controversial pension changes, what they were waiting for: Macronâs key policy would be frozen until 2027.
With the conservative Les RĂ©publicains (LR) already on board, the Socialists said they would refuse to support censorship votes tabled against Lecornu by the extremist factions â meaning the administration would likely endure those votes, due on Thursday.
It is, nevertheless, by no means certain to be able to pass its planned âŹ30bn budget squeeze: the PS explicitly warned that it would be demanding further compromises. âThis,â said its leader, Olivier Faure, âis just the start.â
Changing Political Culture
The problem is, the greater concessions he makes to the left, the more he will meet resistance from the centre-right. And, similar to the Socialists, the right-leaning parties are themselves divided over how to handle the new government â some are still itching to topple it.
A glance at the parliamentary arithmetic shows how tough Lecornuâs task â and longer-term survival â will be. A total of 264 deputies from the RN, radical-left LFI, Greens, Communists and UDR seek his removal.
To achieve that, they need a 288-vote majority in parliament â so if they can persuade just 24 of the PSâs 69 members or the LRâs 47 representatives (or both) to vote with them, Macronâs fifth unstable premier in 24 months is, like his predecessors, toast.
Few would bet against that happening sooner rather than later. Even if, by some miracle, the divided parliament musters collective will to pass a budget by year-end, the outlook afterward look bleak.
So does an exit exist? Early elections would be doubtful to resolve the issue: polls suggest pretty much every party bar the RN would see reduced representation, but there would remain no decisive majority. A fresh premier would confront identical numerical challenges.
Another possibility might be for Macron himself to resign. After winning the presidential election, his successor would disband the assembly and hope to secure a parliamentary majority in the ensuing legislative vote. But that, too, is uncertain.
Surveys show the future president will be Marine Le Pen or Jordan Bardella. There is at least an odds-on chance that French electorate, having chosen a far-right leader, might reconsider giving them parliamentary power.
In the end, France may not escape its predicament until its politicians acknowledge the changed landscape, which is that clear majorities are a thing of the past, winner-takes-all no longer applies, and compromise is not synonymous with failure.
Numerous observers believe that cultural shift will not be possible under the existing governmental framework. âThis isn't a standard political crisis, but a crise de rĂ©gimeâ that will endure indefinitely.
âThe regime ⊠was never designed to facilitate â and even disincentivizes â the emergence of governing coalitions typical across Europe. The Fifth Republic may well have entered its terminal phase.â