🔗 Share this article

Initially, Trump seemed to embrace a firm approach regarding the Ukrainian conflict. Following making warnings of "severe repercussions" in August if Russia's president continued obstructing truce negotiations, he finally imposed considerable sanctions on the Russian biggest energy firms, Lukoil and Rosneft. This decision substantially hindered the Russian leader's capacity to fund his military invasion in Ukraine.

However, through his recently unveiled 28-point peace proposal for Ukraine, which was developed by US and Russian diplomats lacking Ukraine's or European participation, he has apparently reverted to his Russia-friendly approach.

Benefiting Invasion

The former president's initiative would essentially reward the Russian leader for invading a sovereign nation while leaving Ukraine's political freedom in danger. Despite strong statements that "Ukraine's sovereignty will be confirmed", significant aspects of the initiative effectively weaken that essential sovereignty. This constitutes a Kremlin dream would likely be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Reflecting his real-estate background, Trump seems to treat the situation in Ukraine as a mere land disagreement, as if giving Russia a section of Ukraine's territory will satisfy the leader. Yet, Russia's invasion is not only about controlling a damaged region of industrial-devastated territory in the Donbas region. Rather, it is about the nation's democracy – and the Russian leader's obvious desire to destroy it so it stops functions as an enticing model for the Russian people of the democratic governance that Putin's deepening authoritarian rule denies them.

Territorial Concessions

Although maintaining in position the currently divided oblasts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, the plan would require Ukraine to surrender the entire Donetsk region. Aside from benefiting Russia with land that its troops have been unsuccessful to capture in over a ten years of warfare, this concession would leave Ukraine's military defenses critically weakened.

Donetsk is the place of Ukraine's highly-touted "defensive line", the well-established military defenses that constitute a essential impediment to invading forces. The proposal would have Ukraine abandon these fortifications, giving Russian forces a open route to Kyiv in case he subsequently decide to restart the war.

Armed Forces Restrictions

Then, in a action that would facilitate additional fighting easier for Russia, the plan would require the nation to diminish the scale of its armed forces from their existing 800,000 to 850,000 personnel to a cap of six hundred thousand. Importantly, Trump's proposal imposes no equivalent constraints on Russian forces.

Apparently as a accommodation to Russia's campaign to depict the nation's legitimate administration as radicals, Trump's plan states: "Any Nazi doctrine and activities must be opposed and banned." Apparently to underscore this aspect, it insists that "Ukraine will hold elections in 100 days" of a peace deal. At the same time, Trump sets no condition that the Russian leader risk his authoritarian rule by holding elections in his own country.

Protection Commitments

Admittedly, the initiative makes the Russian Federation promise not to "invade other states" and to "incorporate in law its policy of non-aggression towards the EU and the Ukrainian people". However considering that Putin has broken equivalent accords in the history – for example the 1994 agreement, in which Russia pledged to recognize Ukraine's sovereignty in exchange for surrendering its Soviet-era nuclear weapons, and the previous peace deals, in which Moscow promised to a truce and a handback of occupied land in the region to Ukrainian control – why should the international community have confidence in this commitment now?

That is why Ukraine has been so determined on western defense commitments. Although the plan promises a "decisive coordinated defense action" in case Russia restart its military campaign, and states that "The nation will receive dependable defense commitments", the particulars range from unclear to troubling. The plan would not just prevent Ukraine accession to NATO but also prohibit Nato members from positioning forces on the nation's land, thus precluding the security presence, likely commanded by European powers, on which Ukraine had been counting to deter Russia from rebuilding his weakened military, re-equipping, and resuming aggression.

International Reaction

Another side agreement according to sources would provide the nation with a Nato-style protection assurance, in which any later "significant, planned, and continuous armed attack" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "will be treated as an assault jeopardizing the tranquility of the Western nations." That suggests a defense action. Yet different from a powerful Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's most reliable defense against future invasion – the success of the supplementary deal would depend on the dedication of Western powers, such as Trump, to respond through arms to Russia's attacks, a response they have {not